American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 5 , Pages 443-444 , November 2008

Preeclampsia: new approaches but the same old problems

References 

  1. Buhimschi I, Zhao G, Funai EF, et al. Proteomic profiling of urine identifies speciic fragments of SERPINA1 and albumin as biomarkers of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:551;e1-e16
  2. Chesley LC. Hypertension in pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1979;23:97–151
  3. Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, Roberts JM. Prediction of adverse outcomes by common definitions of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:261–267
  4. Chesley LC, Annitto JE, Cosgrove RA. The remote prognosis of eclamptic women: sixth periodic report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;124:446–459
  5. Funai EF, Friedlander Y, Paltiel O, et al. Long-term mortality after preeclampsia. Epidemiology. 2005;16:206–215
  6. Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, Lie RT. Long term mortality of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. Br Med J. 2001;323:1213–1217
  7. Xiong X, Fraser WD. Association of preeclampsia with high birth weight for gestational age (Reply). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1106–1107
  8. Chesley LC. Diagnosis of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:423–425
  9. Roberts JM, Bodnar LM, Lain KY, et al. Uric acid is as important as proteinuria in identifying fetal risk in women with gestational hypertension. [see comment] Hypertension. 2005;46:1263–1269

PII: S0002-9378(08)00789-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.005

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 199, Issue 5 , Pages 443-444 , November 2008