American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 2 , Pages 136.e1-136.e4 , February 2009

Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial

  • Horace Roman, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Rouen, Rouen, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints: Horace Roman, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatric Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, PO Box 250566, Charleston, SC 29425
  • ,
  • Tara F. Hulsey, PhD, RN, CNE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  • ,
  • Loïc Marpeau, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Rouen, Rouen, France
  • ,
  • Thomas C. Hulsey, ScD, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Received 21 November 2007 ,Revised 21 February 2008 ,Accepted 7 April 2008.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

 Cite this article as: Roman H, Hulsey TF, Marpeau L, et al. Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:136.e1-136.e4.

PII: S0002-9378(08)00402-X

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.011

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 200, Issue 2 , Pages 136.e1-136.e4 , February 2009