« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 5
, Pages
e16-e24
, May 2008
Risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia, Washington state, 1987-2004
-
Study population and case control selection, recurrent shoulder dystocia at vaginal delivery, Washington state, 1987-2004
Moore. Risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia, Washington state, 1987-200
Study population and case control selection, recurrent shoulder dystocia at vaginal delivery, Washington state, 1987-2004
Moore. Risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia, Washington state, 1987-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008.
-
The annual incidence of primary and recurrent shoulder dystocia at vaginal delivery in Washington stateThe annual incidence of primary and recurrent shoulder dystocia at vaginal delivery, Washington sThe annual incidence of primary and recurrent shoulder dystocia at vaginal delivery in Washington state
The annual incidence of primary and recurrent shoulder dystocia at vaginal delivery, Washington state, 1987-2004. x axis, birth years; y axis, incidence per 1000 vaginal births.
Moore. Risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia, Washington state, 1987-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008.
-
Risk factors of recurrent shoulder dystociaRisk factors of recurrent shoulder dystocia among women with a shoulder dystocia in a previous delivery, with and without recurrence in a subsequent deliveryRisk factors of recurrent shoulder dystocia
Risk factors of recurrent shoulder dystocia among women with a shoulder dystocia in a previous delivery, with and without recurrence in a subsequent delivery, Washington state, 1987-2004. Multivariable model is adjusted for all variables listed (birthweight at index pregnancy, operative vaginal delivery at index pregnancy, and severe shoulder dystocia at index pregnancy) as well as maternal age, parity, and year of birth.
Moore. Risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia, Washington state, 1987-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008.
This work was supported in part by Grant T76MC00011-21-00 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0002-9378(07)01194-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.050
© 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 198, Issue 5
, Pages
e16-e24
, May 2008
