American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 1138-1142 , October 2006

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: A large, nationwide sample of deliveries

  • Abigail A.D. Ford, MD

      Affiliations

    • College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
  • ,
  • Brian T. Bateman, MD

      Affiliations

    • College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
  • ,
  • Lynn L. Simpson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Lynn L. Simpson, MD, Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 622 West 168th Street, PH 16-66, New York, NY 10032.

Received 19 February 2006 ,Revised 6 June 2006 ,Accepted 9 June 2006.

References 

  1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;54:1–116
  2. Department of Health and Human Services . Evidence report/technical assessment: Vaginal birth after cesarean. New York: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005;p. 71
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . Practice bulletin No. 54. Vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:203–212
  4. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–2589
  5. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:824–830
  6. Strong TH, Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Sarno AP. Vaginal birth after cesarean in the twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:29–32
  7. Miller DA, Mullin P, Hou D, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:194–198
  8. Odeh M, Tarazova L, Wolfson M, Oettinger M. Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:663–666
  9. Aboulfalah A, Abbassi H, el Karroumi M, Himmi A, el Mansouri A. Twin delivery after cesarean section: is a trial of labor warranted?. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1999;28:820–824
  10. Wax JR, Philput C, Mather J, Steinfeld JD, Ingardia CJ. Twin vaginal birth after cesarean. Conn Med. 2000;64:205–208
  11. Myles T. Vaginal birth of twins after a previous cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001;10:171–174
  12. Sansregret A, Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Twin delivery after a previous caesarean: a twelve-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:294–298
  13. Delaney T, Young DC. Trial of labour compared to elective caesarean in twin gestations with a previous caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:289–292
  14. Coutty N, Deruelle P, Delahousse G, Le Goueff F, Subtil D. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery in twin gestation: is trial of labor allowed?. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004;32:855–859
  15. Varner MW, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Atef HM, Hauth JC, Landon MB, et al. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:135–140
  16. Cahill A, Stamilio DM, Pare E, Peipert JP, Stevens EJ, Nelson DB, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean attempt in twin pregnancies: is it safe?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1050–1055
  17. International Classification of Diseases—Clinical Modifications, 9th revision. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 1991;
  18. Gregory KD, Korst LM, Cane P, Platt LD, Kahn K. Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:985–989
  19. Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:89–92

 Presented at the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Miami, FL, January 30-February 4, 2006.

PII: S0002-9378(06)00760-5

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.036

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 1138-1142 , October 2006