American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 1127-1131 , October 2006

The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia

  • Alan M. Peaceman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Rebecca Gersnoviez, MS

      Affiliations

    • The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Mark B. Landon, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • ,
  • Catherine Y. Spong, MD

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD
  • ,
  • Kenneth J. Leveno, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
  • ,
  • Michael W. Varner, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • ,
  • Dwight J. Rouse, MD, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
  • ,
  • Atef H. Moawad, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Steve N. Caritis, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • ,
  • Margaret Harper, MD

      Affiliations

    • Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • Ronald J. Wapner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Yoram Sorokin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
  • ,
  • Menachem Miodovnik, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
    • Columbia University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Marshall Carpenter, MD

      Affiliations

    • Brown University, Providence, RI
  • ,
  • Mary J. O'Sullivan, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Miami, Miami, FL
  • ,
  • Baha M. Sibai, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN
  • ,
  • Oded Langer, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
  • ,
  • John M. Thorp, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
  • ,
  • Susan M. Ramin, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX
  • ,
  • Brian M. Mercer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
  • ,
  • for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network

Received 9 March 2006 ,Revised 16 May 2006 ,Accepted 1 June 2006.

References 

  1. Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. Labor after previous cesarean: influence of prior indication and parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:913–916
  2. Clark SL, Eglinton GS, Beall M, Phelan JP. Effect of indication for previous cesarean section on subsequent delivery outcome in patients undergoing a trial of labor. J Repro Med. 1984;29:22–25
  3. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:927–932
  4. Hoskins IA, Gomez JL. Correlation between maximum cervical dilation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:591–593
  5. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor following prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1016–1023
  6. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:903–905
  7. Flamm BL, Goings JR. Vagina birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication?. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:694–697
  8. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:824–830
  9. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–2589
  10. Impey L, O'Herlihy C. First delivery after cesarean delivery for strictly defined cephalopelvic disproportion. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:799–803
  11. Seitchik J, Rao VRR. Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women for failed oxytocin-augmented labor: route of delivery in subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143:393–397

 Supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD21410, HD21414, HD27860, HD27861, HD27869, HD27905, HD27915, HD27917, HD34116, HD34122, HD34136, HD34208, HD34210, HD40500, HD40485, HD40544, HD40545, HD40560, HD40512, and HD36801).Presented at the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Miami, FL, January 30-February 4, 2006.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0002-9378(06)00696-X

doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.003

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 195, Issue 4 , Pages 1127-1131 , October 2006