American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 186, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S94-S109, May 2002

Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: A systematic review

University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, England

Abstract 

Parenteral opioids are commonly used for labor pain relief and have been the subject of research for many years. The objectives of this review were to determine the safety and effectiveness of parenteral opioids in this context. Of 85 trials systematically reviewed, 48 comprising more than 9800 were included, but the number of trials contributing data to individual outcome measures is very limited. Epidural provides better pain relief. However, if women opt for systemic analgesia, no strong preference for any of the opioids can be recommended. Pethidine is the most commonly used opioid worldwide, and although there are considerable doubts about its analgesic effectiveness and concerns about its potential maternal, fetal, and neonatal side effects, it has the virtue of familiarity and low cost. There is as yet no convincing research evidence to show that alternative opioids are better. In view of the large number of women who receive opioids in labor and the paucity of research evidence about the relative effectiveness and side effects of different opioids and opioids compared with other methods (apart from epidural), well-designed and suitably sized trials of pethidine versus the main alternatives that address substantive outcomes for mothers and babies are strongly recommended. (J Am Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S94-109.)

Keywords:  Obstetric analgesia, pregnancy, labor, pain relief, narcotics, opioids

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprints will not be available.

PII: S0002-9378(02)70185-3

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume 186, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S94-S109, May 2002